Financial Fellow

Financial Insight for Young Professionals

Should You Get a Fixed Rate Mortgage or an ARM?

April 5th, 2009 · 3 Comments

Written by J.P. Wicklein

     Buying a home will require you to make a myriad of decisions.  One of the most significant questions you’ll need to answer is whether to get a fixed rate mortgage or an adjustable rate mortgage (ARM).  The answer to this question generally depends on two factors:  1) What’s the difference in interest rates between the ARM and the fixed rate?  2) How long do you plan to stay in the home you’ll be buying?    

     Let’s assume that you plan on taking out a 30 year mortgage.  If the interest rate for an ARM is the same for a fixed rate mortgage then you should probably go with the fixed rate (assuming interest rates are near historical lows).  If, however, the interest rate on the ARM is less you should ask yourself how long you plan to stay in the home you will be buying.  If you know with a high degree of certainty that you will sell your home before the interest rate on the ARM adjusts, you should consider an ARM.

     The following example compares a $175,000 mortgage on a 5 year ARM at 5.5% to a fixed rate mortgage at 6.0%.  Your monthly payments on the fixed rate mortgage will be $55 a month more than the ARM.  Over 5 years that adds up to a difference of $3,300.  If you sell your home within 5 years of buying it, the ARM will be the better loan to choose.   (It should be noted that although the ARM generates slightly larger principal payments during the fixed period of the loan, these gains largely are offset by the larger interest deduction of the fixed rate mortgage.)

 

Note:  A 5/2/5 ARM can increase or decrease no more than 2% per rate adjustment period (in this case annually) and never adjust higher or lower than 5% above the original rate when the loan becomes variable.

     The above chart reveals the worst case scenario - the ARM resets after 5 years to 7.5% and again after 6 years to 9.5%.  Under the worst case scenario the ARM will still be the cheaper loan for the first 6 years and 4 months.  After which time the fixed rate loan will become cheaper.  Let’s look at an example using a 10 year ARM.

     The chart below compares a $250,000 mortgage on a 10 Year ARM at 5.75% to a fixed rate mortgage at 6.5%.  In this case, choosing the 10 year ARM will save you $121 per month and $14,500 after 10 years.   The 10 Year ARM will be the cheaper loan for at least the first 13 years and 4 months.  (The chart below assumes the ARM resets at the maximum 2% annually and caps out at 10.75%).   

     

The bottom line

     Choosing an ARM over a fixed rate mortgage is a calculated risk.  If you stay in your home too long after the ARM resets you could wind up paying more money to your lender than you would have if you chose a fixed rate mortgage.  That said if the difference in interest rates between the two loan types is great enough, choosing an ARM can save you a sizable amount of money. 

Photo by: alexbrn

Tags: Loans · Mortgages · Real Estate

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Ditech Home Loans // Apr 6, 2009 at 10:30 am

    Adjustable mortgages can be good for a short term of a few years, otherwise they become financially risky.

  • 2 JT // Apr 8, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    Does anyone really know how long they will stay in their home? Sure, you can set a time table for yourself, say in 5 years I will sell this house (hopefully for profit) and move into a bigger home. Fast forward 5 years today you lost your job and it’s not a seller’s market. So if you took out an 5-year ARM loan, you will live in fear that interest rate will adjust to a higher rate (though it’s not too likely since interest rate is at its historical low). Nonetheless, it’s the uncertainly that creates fear and you know what fear usually does to people……

  • 3 Financial Fellow // Apr 9, 2009 at 7:23 am

    JT -

    Thanks for your comments.

    Agreed, most people never really know if they will be selling their house by a certain point or not. I think there are some situations, though, where people will have a pretty good idea.

    Using myself as an example: I bought a 1 bedroom condo in the city when I was 25 years old. I knew that at some point in time I’d meet someone and want to have kids. So, I knew that I wouldn’t be raising a family of 4 in a one bedroom condo. Maybe I’d be 30 when I get married and have kids, maybe 35.

    When I bought my place I took out a 7 year ARM since the rate was around 1% less. After doing some math on it I realized that I’d have to stay in my place for 9 years in order for the 30 year fixed to have been the better decision. If I moved out sooner the ARM would have been the right move. Since I knew there was a very good chance I’d be married and have kids by then it made sense for me to get the ARM.

    That said, if I already had a family and a 3 bed 2 bath house chances are I’d go with the fixed instead of the ARM.

    That’s my thinking anyway. : )

    John (Financial Fellow)

Leave a Comment